From 6710bb3f014e7582af508e35d8c23f9545a0ec91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mariam90w87902 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 19:39:37 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Add=20'Such=20Folks=20Weren=E2=80=99t=20Imagine?= =?UTF-8?q?d=20to=20Exist'?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Such-Folks-Weren%E2%80%99t-Imagined-to-Exist.md | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Such-Folks-Weren%E2%80%99t-Imagined-to-Exist.md diff --git a/Such-Folks-Weren%E2%80%99t-Imagined-to-Exist.md b/Such-Folks-Weren%E2%80%99t-Imagined-to-Exist.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..68c3a80 --- /dev/null +++ b/Such-Folks-Weren%E2%80%99t-Imagined-to-Exist.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +
The accused Harvard plagiarist doesn’t have a photographic memory. Kaavya Viswanathan has an excuse. On this morning’s New York Times, the author of How Opal Mehta Received Kissed, Got Wild, and Acquired a Life explained how she "unintentionally and unconsciously" plagiarized upward of 29 passages from the books of another young-grownup novelist, Megan McCafferty. Viswanathan said she has a photographic memory. This seems like as good an opportunity as any to clear up the best enduring fantasy about human memory. Heaps of individuals claim to have a photographic memory, but no person truly does. Well, maybe one particular person. In 1970, a Harvard vision scientist named Charles Stromeyer III published a landmark paper in Nature a couple of Harvard scholar named Elizabeth, who may carry out an astonishing feat. Stromeyer showed Elizabeth’s proper eye a pattern of 10,000 random dots, and a day later, he confirmed her left eye another dot sample. She mentally fused the two photos to type a random-dot stereogram and then noticed a three-dimensional image floating above the surface.
+ +
Elizabeth seemed to supply the first conclusive proof that photographic [Memory Wave](https://pattern-wiki.win/wiki/User:Dorothea4755) is feasible. But then in a cleaning soap-opera twist, Stromeyer married her, and she was never examined again. In 1979, a researcher named John Merritt published the results of a photographic memory take a look at he had placed in magazines and newspapers across the nation. Merritt hoped somebody may come forward with talents just like Elizabeth’s, [MemoryWave Guide](https://cagit.cacode.net/michelemuscio) and he figures that roughly 1 million people tried their hand on the check. Of that number, 30 wrote in with the appropriate reply, and he visited 15 of them at their homes. However, with the scientist looking over their shoulders, not one in every of them could pull off Elizabeth’s trick. There are such a lot of unlikely circumstances surrounding the Elizabeth case-the marriage between topic and scientist, the lack of further testing, the inability to search out anybody else with her talents-that some psychologists have concluded that there’s something fishy about Stromeyer’s findings. He denies it. "We don’t have any doubt about our information," he [advised](https://www.accountingweb.co.uk/search?search_api_views_fulltext=advised) me just lately.
+ +
That’s to not say there aren’t folks with extraordinarily good recollections-there are. They just can’t take psychological snapshots and recall them with excellent fidelity. 53-yr-old savant who was the idea for Dustin Hoffman’s character in Rain Man, is claimed to have memorized every web page of the 9,000-plus books he has learn at eight to 12 seconds per web page (every eye reads its own page independently), though that claim has by no means been rigorously examined. Another savant, Stephen Wiltshire, has been known as the "human camera" for his capacity to create sketches of a scene after taking a look at it for just some seconds. However even he doesn’t have a truly photographic memory. His thoughts doesn’t work like a Xerox. Photographic memory is commonly confused with another bizarre-but actual-perceptual phenomenon known as eidetic memory, which happens in between 2 and 15 percent of children and very not often in adults. An eidetic image is essentially a vivid afterimage that lingers within the mind’s eye for as much as a couple of minutes earlier than fading away.
+ +
Children with eidetic memory by no means have anything close to good recall, they usually usually aren’t able to visualize something as detailed as a physique of textual content. In each case except Elizabeth’s where somebody has claimed to own a photographic memory, there has always been another explanation. A bunch of Talmudic students identified as the Shass Pollakssupposedly stored mental snapshots of all 5,422 pages of the Babylonian Talmud. In accordance with a paper published in 1917 in the [journal Psychological](https://www.paramuspost.com/search.php?query=journal%20Psychological&type=all&mode=search&results=25) Evaluation, psychologist George Stratton tested the Shass Pollaks by sticking a pin by way of various tractates of the Talmud. They responded by telling him exactly which phrases the pin handed via on every page. The truth is, the Shass Pollaks probably didn’t possess photographic [Memory Wave](http://kpro.shanghaiopen.org.cn:8005/demetriachavis) so much as heroic perseverance. If the typical person decided he was going to dedicate his total life to memorizing 5,422 pages of textual content, he’d most likely even be fairly good at it. It’s a powerful feat of single-mindedness, not of memory.
\ No newline at end of file